The Apostle Thomas is regularly alluded to as “Questioning” Thomas since, when he had been informed that Jesus had become alive once again, he would not trust it. It was shortly after Thomas had really seen Jesus with his own eyes and had actually reviewed and contacted the injuries in Jesus’ grasp and side that the Apostle Thomas came to accept that Jesus had truth be told been revived.

The name Thomas is normally accepted to have gotten from Aramaic toma, signifying “twin”. In The Gospel of John, Thomas is alluded to as “Thomas, likewise called Didymus”, where didimo is Greek for “twin”. It is conceivable that Thomas was conceived a twin and, thus, his folks chose to refer to him as “the twin”. Be that as it may, in light of the fact that, as per The Gospel of John, he was classified “the twin” in both Greek and in Aramaic, “the twin” was presumably not a given name but rather was a moniker given to the Apostle since he appeared as though another person.

The most probable individual Thomas could have been contrasted with would have been Jesus, and that would appear to make sense of why The Gospel of John makes reference to that Thomas was classified “the twin” in both Aramaic and in Greek yet doesn’t even try to specify what thomas’ identity was said to resemble (undoubtedly by the people who were not devotees of Jesus). The possibility that Thomas was generally seen by outcasts as Jesus’ twin is truth be told reflected (excuse the joke) in The Book of Thomas the Contender, which was found in the Nag Hammadi library. In that text, Jesus shares with Thomas “since it has been said that you are my twin and genuine companion…”, clarifying that there was normal conviction that Thomas was Jesus’ twin or body twofold.

Another chance is that the Apostle’s given name really was Thomas however (1) that the name didn’t get from Aramaic toma and (2) that, since Thomas resembled Jesus and his name seemed to get from toma, a bogus historical background immediately fostered that prompted him being classified “the twin” by the Greek talking local area of the district. Judea had for quite some time been essential for the Seleucid Empire, and an extremely normal Macedonian name was Ptolemy, which, in Aramaic, was delivered Gospel of Thomas as Talmai or Talmais. That could make sense of why he was otherwise called Judas, which essentially recognized him as Judean; on the grounds that there was a craving to clarify that he was of Judaic instead of Greek plummet. Note that Bartholomew, the name of the Apostle who might have ventured out to India with Thomas after Jesus’ torturous killing, is accepted to get from bar Talmai, signifying “child of Ptolemy”.

As per The Acts of Thomas, the Apostle Thomas made a trip from Syria to Taxila in present-day Pakistan. He later cruised toward the Southwestern bank of India, where he laid out a few holy places in and around Kerala prior to being killed. While his presence in Southwestern India might appear to be odd to the individuals who initially know about it, there is valid justification for him to have gone there. Shipping lanes by transport had been laid out among India and the Middle East in extremely old times. A Jewish diaspora, truth be told, was at that point deep rooted in Southwestern India at the hour of Jesus. The mission of the Apostles was explicitly to spread the gospel to the Jewish individuals all through the world. So it seems OK that a portion of the Apostles might have either chosen (or maybe had been chosen) to head out to India to satisfy that goal. The presence of old Christian holy places in Southwestern India today truth be told gives confidence to the cases made in The Acts of Thomas.